Thread: Hey FIRST we need a bigger national!
View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-11-2003, 10:35
Joe Matt's Avatar
Joe Matt Joe Matt is offline
Wake Up Get Up Get Out There
no team
  
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: CAK
Posts: 5,067
Joe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Matt has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Ross
Who's facts need correcting? Tton's, Mike Bett's, or Matt Leese's?



What's your definition of a bigger regional? 75 teams, 100 teams? 150 teams? What about a medium sized nats? 200 teams, 150 teams, the same size as a bigger regional?

Basically, I can't disagree with you until I know what you are saying
TTon said ther were 6 fields and 400 teams. That's WAY off.

Also, by a medium sized nats, I mean 300-350 teams.
__________________