Thread: Should the judging criteria be changes?
View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-12-2003, 02:08
jonathan lall's Avatar
jonathan lall jonathan lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #2505 (The Electric Sheep; FRC #0188 alumnus)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 547
jonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to jonathan lall
Re: Should the judging criteria be changes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Shaw 237
Well I know alot of people are saying to not take it seriously, but hello, i work on the Sie-H20-Bots site with a couple other people and we take our job VERY seriously. We want to win the award. FOr one thing, this award can mean the difference between going and not going to nationals for us. I think that there should be another way to judge the sites than let students pick it.
Err, I'm reasonably certain that this award doesn't contribute toward the point system (correct me if I'm wrong but it isn't a judged award). If it does, then the only truly fair way to go about websites is not to have an award at all. Seriously, what would a website judge judge on?
__________________