View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2004, 16:55
ChrisH's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
ChrisH ChrisH is offline
Generally Useless
FRC #0330 (Beach 'Bots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 1,229
ChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Redimensioning in AutoCAD

Quote:
Originally Posted by indieFan
Well, I used AutoCAD 2002 to draw the part. Essentially, I drew a circle of 0.25" diameter and then extruded the circle. Whether or not that changes it to a 3D or not, I have no clue. (I'll have to read the book as my prof. never discussed that stuff with us.)

As for the RP machine, it's a 3D Systems ThermoJet. Easy removal of the support structures, but no so easy to mate two parts that are "identical" in size. (ie, 1/4" bearing to 1/4" shaft)

indieFan
The basic problem is probably two fold.

First, for rapid prototypes you need to plan your gaps just as you would when making metal parts. So if you want to put a bushing on a shaft, for example, you need to make sure that the hole in the bushing is slightly larger than the shaft. So if you have a shaft that is precision ground to be 0.250 + or - 0.001 then your minimum hole diameter should be something like 0.252. Press fits are a slightly different story, but I probably wouldn't press fit anything made of wax.

If you accounted for this in the design, then you still have the issue of the .stl file used to build the prototype. STLs are approximations of the shape of you part composed entirely of planar triangles. Curved surfaces (like the inside of a hole) are approximated by a bunch of triangles connected together. That's why holes produced by Rapid Prototyping machines aren't round, they are polygons. So you also need to allow for the fact that round things will not be round, nor will their diameter be constant around the part

With some converters you can control how big the "chordal tolerance", the distance between the triangle and the cad model surface , can get. Other converters use a fixed number for this and if it's too big you get huge facets and an ugly looking part. For my work I like to use a maximum chordal tolerance of 0.003 in. Sometimes I have to take it down to 0.001 to get good results. But one of the CAD systems I use has a fixed value of 0.010".

So the answer to your problem may be to simply retranslate with a much smaller chordal tolerance. Also be aware that most rapid prototype systems have tolerances on the order of +or- 0.005in/in. So if you want things to fit together you often need to allow substantial gaps between parts, like 0.010-0.020 in. or more

On the other hand RP machines are pretty fun to work with. I like loading the file in the afternoon and having the part the next day, exactly as I designed it. Of course then there's no opportunity for the machinist to point out your mistakes before the part is done either

OOPS time to go back downstairs and finish glueing the SLS (another rapid prototype method) mold I made together. The glue from the previous joint should be set by now.
__________________
Christopher H Husmann, PE

"Who is John Galt?"