Thread: Vacuum
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-01-2004, 19:33
Rickertsen2 Rickertsen2 is offline
Umm Errr...
None #1139 (Chamblee Gear Grinders)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,421
Rickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Rickertsen2 Send a message via Yahoo to Rickertsen2
Re: Vacuum

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy
I do not think that you have enough compressor "umph" to efficiently implement a venturi vacuum generator. I also would quicly discount centrifigal vac pumps (there heavy- upwards 100 lbs) and turbo molecular vacs (expensive-upwards $15000).

I would try to drive a pnumatic cylinder with a cam on a motor with one way valves that seems like the easiest, lightest, most cost effective solution.

good luck!
-Andy
But since one way valves arn't really legal either, you can use a double solenoid in place of one, as long as you know when the cylinder is extending and retracting. Rather that use a cam, why not put two cylinders parallel to each other and link them together, driving one, while using the other to generate a vacuum. As far as the practicality of generating a vacuum on a FIRST robot or the usefulness of doing so: impractical and useless, but its still interestign to discuss.
__________________
1139 Alumni