View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-15-2004, 05:19 PM
Rickertsen2 Rickertsen2 is offline
Umm Errr...
None #1139 (Chamblee Gear Grinders)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,421
Rickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Rickertsen2 Send a message via Yahoo to Rickertsen2
Re: Mulit-postioning with pnuematics this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenWittlief
Since we are allowed to use more than what we have been limited to in the past, there is something Ive been wanting to try for a while, maybe this year we can.

Ive always wanted a way to be able to use a pnuematic cylinder with more control than full out or full in.

If we use extra valves on the exhaust side (the ones we dont normally put fittings on) couldnt you pressurize one side and have the cylinder go all the way out, then pressurize the other side, and have the cylinder goto the CENTER position?

if you had a position sensor, and you used the flow restrictors, couldnt you control the amount of air in each side (using more than one valve) to position it anywhere between the two extreems?

Anyone ever play around with this or try it?

any thoughts? seems like it would be perfect for controlling the position of an arm, infinitely variable.
The setup isn't ideal, but you can prolyl bootleg it to work. The cylinders are fince for this, and it is done all the time but not with this type of valve. You will also need some position feedback(I don't think the reed switches will work. They are probably not fast enough.). If you try what you describe above, i would be interested to hear the results.
__________________
1139 Alumni