View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2004, 23:53
jonathan lall's Avatar
jonathan lall jonathan lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #2505 (The Electric Sheep; FRC #0188 alumnus)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 547
jonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to jonathan lall
Re: Website Resolution for Awards?

Great, this is what I was afraid of; now we're concentrating less on what we were doing for our sites, and more on playing to the judges. Inevitable I guess.

Ideally, websites should work in any resolution. To say that yours doesn't work with browser X or a certain resolution would be IMO copping out. Technology has nothing to do with it; if anything, it's actually the opposite. As deltacoder1020 mentioned, CSS can solve these problems, whether by making the page fluid (page reflow recalculated as the window changes size), or fixed at a low size. I intend to make print and low-capability stylesheet for other media for my websites when I get the time. But practically, I doubt catering to 640 x 480 is necessary. Oh, and I would rather drive a Model T than an RX 8.
__________________