View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2004, 01:47
jonathan lall's Avatar
jonathan lall jonathan lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #2505 (The Electric Sheep; FRC #0188 alumnus)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 547
jonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond reputejonathan lall has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to jonathan lall
Re: Legality of Different Battery Connector

They clearly mean the Anderson connectors provided are preferable at the very least (surely a good safety precaution to standardize to help the inspectors out), but your interpretation of it being electrical and not an electronic component (which of course have rules tacked on) is reasonable. I'd stay on the safe side and not try to interpret the rules here; this is probably a question for the Question/Answer System since the change in wording from last year means different semantics are intended, although the main clause of <R20> is clearly in turn feeds power to the Main Power Disconnect Switch and Circuit Breaker Assembly. If you mentioned what was acceptable last year in a QA post, and state your general intentions, FIRST would probably welcome it.
__________________