My point was not to defend my choice of program, that is uneccessary. I was simply making the point that calling something the most simple possible may be an oversight when you take into account that different people function in different ways and I strongly doubt that he has tried every sound editor.
For me, a commandline based sound editor may be very simple and perfect for my usage. (Yes, including editablity.) In reality for editability it's actually audacity, but that's another story. The point is, different people think different things are simple. One should be extremely careful when making rash statements like so:
Quote:
|
premier is the most simple thing you can do
|
It may be true that premire is the most simple thing that bainbane has come accross for his own uses, this does not mean it is the most simple thing you can do. That's all I was trying to say. If you want to see someone who takes this topic much too seriously then you might find a reading of Matt's collection of Windows rants interesting:
http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/rants/ Don't be turned off by the titles, they're actually fairly well thought out.