Thread: Update 6
View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-01-2004, 11:01
Joel J's Avatar
Joel J Joel J is offline
do you..
no team
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,445
Joel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond reputeJoel J has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Update 6

Quote:
Originally Posted by dlavery
Warning!! LONG POST!!! As I started to really think about this, I realized that I was going on way too long. I apologize, but I was really just capturing my thoughts about this, and it turned into a stream-of-consciousness ramble.
.
.
.
Personally, I like where this rule puts us all (and, no, I didn't write it!! ).

-dave

p.s. but, of course, I could be entirely wrong (at least that is what Tony Norman keeps telling me )
Dave.. the intent of the rule is now clear and the reasoning behind it is sound; however, that doesn't mean I'll ever agree with it. You talk about the edge of the haves over the have-nots and I think of the fact that the haves will be the few able to manufacture meaningful spare parts during the 6-week build. Think of it, how many teams build down to the wire just trying to get their actual robot put together and working? The have-nots, who manufacture their robot all themselves, would never have the time necessary to make spare parts while making their actual robot. Eh, FIRST rules are FIRST rules, and I guess I'd better start trying to adapt (though I'd say this is a pothole on the road of common sense being built this year).
__________________
Joel Johnson

Division By Zero (229) Alumni, 2003-2007
RAGE (173) Alumni, 1999-2003

Last edited by Joel J : 31-01-2004 at 11:05.
Reply With Quote