View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2004, 11:28
Specialagentjim's Avatar
Specialagentjim Specialagentjim is offline
"I am a Meat Popsicle"
AKA: Jim Martz
None #0108 (SigmaC@T)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale / Parkland
Posts: 645
Specialagentjim is a splendid one to beholdSpecialagentjim is a splendid one to beholdSpecialagentjim is a splendid one to beholdSpecialagentjim is a splendid one to beholdSpecialagentjim is a splendid one to beholdSpecialagentjim is a splendid one to beholdSpecialagentjim is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Specialagentjim
Re: 2x multiplier removal secnario

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy L
umm...i have a quick technical note...has anybody actually tried cramming the ball down, putting balls on top of it, and then removing it? it's quite difficult for a human to do, let alone a robot (despite the intent.) just mentioning it...

i wonder if this will be the death of the thread...

This is also very true. Now this brings me back to another point of mine (those of you following my posts are probobly wondering where my stance is by now. I have none, I keep pointing out the other side because I don't think its clear). If the 2x is an extension of the robot, then when you move to uncap a goal, a legal operation, you're robot will interact with the small balls. As Jeremy pointed out, this is illegal. Now, however, you've made it illegal to uncap this goal. Dilemma again!
__________________


Curie Division 2005 Champions (175, 33, 108)
UCF 2005 Website Award
Midwest 2005 Delphi's Driving Tomorrow's Technology

2004 UCF QuarterFinalists (1065, 86, 108)

UCF 2003 Regional Champs/Entrepreneurship Award
Midwest Regional 2003 Leadership In Controls/Website award
Nationals 2003 Quarter Finalists
Robot Rodeo 2003 Champions (Alliance: 180 and 186)



AIM S/N: Specialagentjim