View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-02-2004, 16:48
D.Viddy's Avatar
D.Viddy D.Viddy is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dylan Vester
FRC #3176 (Purple Precision)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Camby, IN
Posts: 44
D.Viddy is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Using Digi-Key Shaft Encoders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel J.
I am in heavy deliberation at the moment. I am trying to decide whether or not I wish to use a potentiometer or encoder for something relating to the subject of this thread. I am pretty much at a loss for good reasons (I have never used potentiometers or encoders before), so I am wondering why you have a bias that steers more towards an encoder than to a potentiometer.
Because almost all potentiometers that will find will not revolve all the way around. Also pots wear out very easily when attached to a constantly rotating shaft. Last years controller was too slow for using an encoder. This years processor has no trouble keeping up with a 256 tick encoder. We have ours controlling our motors beautifully right now. Dead recoding is incredably precise with them. It's not a bias, it's just one is better than the other.
__________________
.................................................. .........
Dylan Vester - (Programmer)
Running a P4 1.8 Ghz
Team 998, We can't win...
.................................................. .........