Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JosephM
You know, I'll put 'my ego on the shelf' and just say lets lock this thread. It's going to get ulgy, and it's already happening. It's best for all parties involved just to lock this thread. This is going to be collusion all over again.
|
If this forum is as amazing as I think it is, I think it can handle some intelligent discussion about a new idea that's never been done before at this level.
Putting aside all the messages that's saying "this is cheating and unfair", I think there are some important points from both side. It is VERY IMPORTANT that at this point on none of you get emotional about this topic, IF you want to have a constructive discussion about this. Do NOT let your emotion take control of you. Think for 15 mins before you post.
Now. Important points from each side:
1. By working together both teams have learned something they never would've if they worked alone, and that is, the values of partnership, and learning to work with a new process.
2. It is not as easy as you think to design a robot together.
On the other hand:
1. Joe J. addressed his concern of many powerful teams working may tilt the playing field in their favor.
2. Matt Adams addressed his concern of this collaboration with the spirit of the $3500 limit rule.
There are probably more important points, so remind us of your points if you wish to address your concern further.
Now, let's build a good discussion on top of those sides. I ask that everyone read the entire thread before they post. I will be watching out for messages that claim "I didn't have time to read the message but I feel like posting anyway".
I will be truly disappointed if you guys can't handle a constructive discussion in the most intense time of the build period.