View Single Post
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2004, 22:04
OneAngryDaisy OneAngryDaisy is offline
not on CD enough...
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 785
OneAngryDaisy is a glorious beacon of lightOneAngryDaisy is a glorious beacon of lightOneAngryDaisy is a glorious beacon of lightOneAngryDaisy is a glorious beacon of lightOneAngryDaisy is a glorious beacon of lightOneAngryDaisy is a glorious beacon of light
Re: POLL: have small balls been abandoned?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Waegelin
Is it really necessary to shoot down an idea just because you don't agree with it? Maybe the teams that have ball-holding mechanisms just aren't done yet, or don't want to reveal their designs for doing so. Have you considered that third reason?
hmm... you might not have noticed my teammate's post, but we ourselves are planning to have a ball mechanism- I did not intend to shoot it down, I was just pointing out what I believe to be the 2 main reasons why the majority of robots so far don't have a ball mechanism..


sorry if i came off a bit harsh, that was my view and my view only, please dont discriminate against 341 because of what I said
Reply With Quote