View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-03-2002, 18:28
Unsung FIRST Hero
Nate Smith Nate Smith is offline
FRC Key Volunteer Trainer
AKA: CrazyNate
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Old Town, Maine
Posts: 1,029
Nate Smith is a splendid one to beholdNate Smith is a splendid one to beholdNate Smith is a splendid one to beholdNate Smith is a splendid one to beholdNate Smith is a splendid one to beholdNate Smith is a splendid one to beholdNate Smith is a splendid one to beholdNate Smith is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Nate Smith Send a message via Yahoo to Nate Smith
Rest Easy Joe...

Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Johnson
It seems to me that a team that wants to divide the field in half then just has to put a device right down the middle of the field.

Forget about trying to win a pushing match, just get the goals where you need them and open up on the ground making it impossible to move the goals without having the goal get over my robot. Any team that tries to move the goals gets DQ.

This seems to be a ruling that is not quite ready for prime time...

Am I missing something?

Joe J.
My recollection of the announcement this morning was that the DQ would only occur if, in pushing a goal over a robot's extended arm, damage occurred to the goal as a direct result of pushing it over the mechanism. Now, based on what comes to mind right now, damage to a robot would result before damage to a goal in just about any "push over" case, unless the robot was specifically designed to damage a goal if it was pushed over. In this case, I have a feeling the mechanism would be disallowed under the "intentional damage" rule.
__________________
Nate Smith
nsmith@smythsoft.com
12 seasons, 4 teams, and more time logged behind the scorekeeper's table than I care to remember...
returning for 2011? only time will tell...