|
Re: Seeding System
I like the new system BUT what about this for the future.
#1 Seed: Best win/loss record
#2 Seed: Highest QPs
#3 Seed: Second best win/loss record
#4 Seed: Second highest QPs
#5 Seed: Third best win/loss record
#6 Seed: Third highest QPs
#7 Seed: Fourth best win/loss record
#8 Seed: Fourth highest QPs
Obviously there would need to be tie-breakers ... for win/loss, it would be QPs and for QP, it would be win/loss.
This would certainly change strategies and some teams might change their strategy midway through a tournament if they come out of the gate with a few losses. Admittingly, this would be confusing for spectators but most people just look at a scoreboard to get standings.
Just some "crazy" thoughts,
Lucien
|