View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-03-2004, 09:32
dlavery's Avatar
dlavery dlavery is offline
Curmudgeon
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 3,176
dlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond reputedlavery has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: S.W.A.T. 771's Robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerR
if i recall correctly, the retracting force of a 2-inch bore piston is about 180 lbs (as she said), while the expanding force is over 200 lbs.

Theoretical extension force for a 2" diameter piston at 60 psi is 188.5 pounds (force=piston surface area * pressure). The theoretical retraction force is 176.7 pounds (piston surface area during retraction is reduced by the area of the piston rod). In reality, both of these numbers are slightly reduced due to friction in the system and minute amounts of blow-by around the seals. But the total available force is still more than sufficient to lift a 130 pound robot (unless you have really whaled away at the piston rod and bent it [note to certain team members - pistons are NOT hammers!], in which case you will never lift anything ).

-dave
__________________
"I know what you're thinking, punk," hissed Wordy Harry to his new editor, "you're thinking, 'Did he use six superfluous adjectives or only five?' - and to tell the truth, I forgot myself in all this excitement; but being as this is English, the most powerful language in the world, whose subtle nuances will blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel loquacious?' - well do you, punk?"
- Stuart Vasepuru, 2006 Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest



My OTHER CAR is still on Mars!!!