Thread: Muti-threading
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-04-2004, 16:17
Rickertsen2 Rickertsen2 is offline
Umm Errr...
None #1139 (Chamblee Gear Grinders)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,421
Rickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Rickertsen2 Send a message via Yahoo to Rickertsen2
Re: Muti-threading

Whats to prevent you from implementing software threading now? Absolutely nothing at all. If you really feel you need threading ,then write yourself some threading. On an architecture this small, the overhead of full threading capabilites usually outweighs the benefits of threading.

I personally do not think threading is necessary at this point. If at any point it were necessary, then i would say write your own. We implemented a few processes that ran in the background, but i would hardly call it threading.
__________________
1139 Alumni

Last edited by Rickertsen2 : 06-04-2004 at 16:22.