[edomus]

As part of the 469 alliance I would like to offer my comments. I will be honest and say that I did not take the time to read this whole thread, but it seems that the main argument is that 469 INTENTIONALLY got entangled. Everone should know that this was not at all intentional. We did a strategy session before the match and decided that the only way to counter 93 was to block them from getting the ball drop. To do this we wanted 469 to crab a multiplier ball and hold it over 93. First 469 tried to grap a multiplier for this perpose but it fell out. With only seconds to spare they made a judgement call to try and hold their arm over 93 and prevent as many balls as possible from falling in. THIS was the purpose, and in my mind it is legitimate. They did not intend to get entangled. I am not saying that the entanglement rule should not have applied, because I still havent made my mind up on that. But if the issue was intent, there was no intent to entangle. I would also like to say that it is completely the refs call. It is really not our place to argue over their descisions. They have a tough job, and they try to hold us to the rules as closely as possible.