View Single Post
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-04-2004, 13:58
MikeDubreuil's Avatar
MikeDubreuil MikeDubreuil is offline
Carpe diem
FRC #0125 (Nu-Trons)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 967
MikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond reputeMikeDubreuil has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to MikeDubreuil
Re: 469 Entanglement / Bad Refereeing on Galileo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Copioli
The biggest problem I see is that each year the refs are told to "really enforce" certain rules.
Good post, you got me thinking. Sure, certain rules do change. But there are some that don't entanglement, tipping, etc. They are considered "standard rules" and are included almost every year.

Referees are human and don't want to make the diffcult call of determing whether or not a robot should be disabled. Black and white calls, like when the battery comes loose are easy. However, fuzzy situations like entanglement and tipping are difficult.

There are clearly some who think 469 has violated the rules and others who think 469 is just playing good defense.

I propose that FIRST puts together a video to be shown to all that shows examples of violations of the "standard rules." Actual competition footage could be used. Teams would get a better idea of what they shouldn't do, and referees would have actual examples to use to help determine what intent looks like.
__________________
"FIRST is like bling bling for the brain." - Woodie Flowers