|
Re: You write <G34> and <G35>
but if you can put together a collection of video of examples of rule violations, then those videos become the written rules
can you explain what is happening in those videos to a person who can not see? ok - write down what you are seeing and you now have written rules.
I think one of the biggest problems this year is the word 'intentional' in the rules. Its very much like the word 'premeditated' in the laws for 1st degree murder - its much harder to prove that someone planned or intended to do something ahead of time than it is to prove that they actually DID the thing.
Ive seen lots of posts this year where one team says their bot was tipped or slammed or damaged, and another team comes back and apologizes and says we didnt intend to do that
ok - I accept that at face value, but it reminds me of the sport in the Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy, where two opponents are placed in an arena, you attack your opponent, then retreat to a neutral corner and apologize. You are scored both on the viscousness of your attack AND the sincerety of your apology.
(im not saying the apologies on CD are not sincere)
but this is why 'intend' needs to be removed from the rules and replaced with 'result'. If you are not able to control your robot very well, then keep away from your opponent. Why should you be allowed to topple or damage another teams machine, and win a match - you have in effect disqualified their robot by taking it out of the game, why should you not also be penalized?
if I hold a sharp stick right next to your face, and someone hits my hand and I poke your eye out, do you care if I indented to poke your eye out? no. that would be a careless and irresponsible act on my part. If you are going to play in a wild, uncontrollable or rough manner, and you cause the other team to not be able to play the whole match as a result, then you should be penalized, not them.
thats whats missing from the current rules - what would it take for a ref to know what a driver intended to do? would he have to hear him say 'Im gonna knock that bot over' before the match?
in the end results are what matters - you bean a batter with the baseball then he walks to first base, ALWAYS - it doenst matter where you intended to throw the ball - if you cant throw the ball over the plate, you are going to lose.
if you cant drive your bot around the playfield with out reeking havock on the other machines and the field itself, you SHOULD lose!
Last edited by KenWittlief : 20-04-2004 at 11:03.
|