Thread: Entanglement part II
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2004, 07:03
Ryan M. Ryan M. is offline
Programming User
FRC #1317 (Digital Fusion)
Team Role: Programmer
  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,508
Ryan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud ofRyan M. has much to be proud of
Re: Entanglement part II
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanMcE
(1) Were the two robots (469 and 93) entangled?
Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanMcE
(2) If yes to (1), which robot initiated the entanglement?
Can't tell the number, but the one's that not the hopper-bot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanMcE
(3) If yes to (1), which robot (if any) presented an entanglement hazard?
The hopper-bot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanMcE
(4) If yes to (2), should that robot have been disabled?
Possibly. It might be different from another angle, but it looked like the one robot stopped and intentionally put it's arm down into the hopper of the other robot and then backed up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanMcE
(5) If yes to (2) and/or (3), should that team have been disqualified?
No. It was too close for a measure that extreme.
__________________

Reply With Quote