View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2004, 11:42
Tyler Olds Tyler Olds is offline
FUN Show Host
no team (First Updates Now)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 1,164
Tyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond reputeTyler Olds has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Entanglement part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanMcE
Ok, my last post went bad real quick (mostly my fault) so I'm going to try to keep this one more to the point so I can get some useful feedback.

Here is The Video of the play in question.

I have five (5) questions. When replying I would appreciate answers in order with numbers and (optional) justification to make everything easier to read. Here are the questions:

(1) Were the two robots (469 and 93) entangled?
(2) If yes to (1), which robot initiated the entanglement?
(3) If yes to (1), which robot (if any) presented an entanglement hazard?
(4) If yes to (2), should that robot have been disabled?
(5) If yes to (2) and/or (3), should that team have been disqualified?
1. yes
2. 469
3. 93 (we did)
4. Possiably, however if they were diabled we would have still been stuck
5. My oppinion would be too biased and one sided, so i guess you can guess my answer. However i do understand why there was no call.
__________________
First Updates Now Show Host.
Watch and Listen to FUN on Youtube, iTunes, and www.firstupdatesnow.com
FRC Emcee 2009-2016: Team 2826 Wave Robotics Lead Mentor 2001-2004 Team 93 NEW Apple Corps Alumni
CD Moderator
Reply With Quote