View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2004, 13:52
Greg Needel's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Greg Needel Greg Needel is offline
REVving up for a new season
FRC #2848 (All-sparks)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,104
Greg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Buckeye rules Newton (1126, 67, 340)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elgin Clock
I think that this is a major flaw in the divisional listings and should be changed.
Never should the same regional winning alliance all be in the same division.

I don't want to see this happening next year.

as i think that it was cool that a winning alliance could share the victory i think they should mix up the divisions a bit more. I think there should be an equal representation from each regional in the divisions as well as an equal number of regional winners

my proposed solution is you take the list of regional winners attending nationals and do the 1,2,3,4 with them and assign them divisions first then go down the rest of the list of teams attending 1,2,3,4 and that will eliminate the possibility of this happening


The only possibility that could happen is if multiple teams compete and win different regionals then there might be a chance of 2 of the teams from a winning alliance together but all 3 teams wont be possible