Quote:
|
Just in even if they arent weapons of mass destruction they can still kill you and me and are capable of carrying weapons of mass destruction
|
So are taxi cabs.
Should we start searching the desert for Iraqi taxi cabs? Of course not, no one is going to drive a taxi cab to the US, or Israel for that matter.
But then, neither is anyone going to a fly a Mig to the US, or Israel. Buried Migs still do not constitute a reason to attack a country. I'm sorry, but I have yet to see any justification for this war.
A lot of nations (and individuals) have a lot of weapons of mass destruction. preemptive attacks against nations with months of forewarning clearly do nothing to lessen that threat. If anything, the most recent war in Iraq has only increased the instability of the region and number of young men pissed off at the US (that means more terriosts).
If you want to decrease the number of nations with WMD, lets start by getting rid of the reason to have them. That means some honest diplomacy sans air strikes. It's not as exciting, but it offers at least the possibility of success. Something this war never had.
Why people continue to think this war had
anything to do with curbing terror is beyond me.
-Andy A.