|
Re: Best Human Player????
33 jumps right into my mind....but that has a lot to do with the number of balls they collected....they could have had a horrible shooter but the sheer number of balls they and teams like them would have made up for it...still a very good shot tho
i was watching the matches and doing match sheets (actually very interesting work) for our team and saw most teams hitting between 66 and 100% of their shots...most of the teams, also, just shot their original balls and hung...so they were hitting 2 of the 3 usually...thats what i saw anyway over on archimedes
__________________
eat your durned chicken
|