View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2004, 22:53
Solace's Avatar
Solace Solace is offline
Head Hurts. Coffee. More. Now!
AKA: Jake
#0571 (Team Paragon)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 569
Solace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to beholdSolace is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Solace
Re: Who has the best small ball capabilities?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yan Wang
33 hands down... not only were they as fast as 45 or 571's mechanisms (granted that 571 could really shoot those balls out fast), they could wait under the ball drop to get 3-6 balls and they had AN AMAZING DRIVETRAIN which was dominating for a small ball manipulator. You could play defense, but they were stronger. 45 and 571 get mad props due to their 2x ball abilities though.
yeah, 33 and 45 were cool, but could THEY pick up the 10 point balls from the tee and put them in the big goal with the robot? HMMM? no? granted its illegal, but it was still fun to do on the practice field.

for those who've never seen us

besides, shooting the balls out fast only helps when they don't bounce out (an annoying problem at times). it is pretty cool to see the robot dump a load of balls from mid-field though (i don't have a movie, i'll post one if i find one)

my personal favorite ballbot would have to be 45. A high capacity hopper and an amazing capping arm made minced meat of the competition (including us). If we do end up going to IRI this year, I wanna see another 571 + 45 match (the twins, as Joel Johnson would call them)
__________________
...What is a man,
If the chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep, and tool? A nerd, no more.

2004 UTC New England #2 seed
2004 UTC New England Champions with 716 & 230
2004 Archimedes #2 seed, undeafeated in Qualifiers (for what its worth)


Jake
Team Paragon #571
Reply With Quote