|
back to the old?
Does anyone else think FIRST should go back to the old system of rankings? I mean my opinion is obviously biased since we did well in points this year, but did the Win-Loss idea really work out? Many teams just benefitted from great partners and ended up squeaking out a match, but there seemed to be no real reward for such a close match. Just a high qp-that could ultimately be ignored.
I also think with using the point system only, it will make scouting more important, because they will have to look at records deeper, and actually see who is defensive and who isnt. This year everything was right there for you. Id rather see a challenge out there.
__________________
Don't be scared to post something that is more than "dave is great" "here's my caption contest entry" and "overdrive is the best thing ever". Say something interesting. Say something that will make others think. Create discussion.
If you do say something that isn't just for fun or praising something, which hopefully you do, just be prepared to back up what you said.
Remember: GP is Gracious Professionalism, not Glorifiying Plesantries. Saying something negative does not mean you are evil. It could help someone out a lot.
Anything that I post is an opinion from my own mind. Some may agree with it, others may not. However do not negatively associate anyone else, including any team I work with, with my opinion.
|