|
Re: back to the old?
On the flip side of the coin; with the old ranking system, the teams that did really great (i.e. winning with a great margin of points) would be lower in the standings than perhaps what truly reflected their abilities. Since their score was based on the loser's score, if they played very well, they might end up with a lower score than the teams that barely came ontop of their matches (having a smaller margin of points).
And like already said; the eliminations are based on winning; not points. So the current score system more accurately reflects a team that will be more apt to do well in the finals.
__________________
Joules per second! Watt? Joules per second! Watt? Jouls per second! Watt?
|