Thread: What Features Should the Default Code REALLY include?
View Single Post
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-04-2004, 07:36
Astronouth7303's Avatar
Astronouth7303 Astronouth7303 is offline
Why did I come back?
AKA: Jamie Bliss
FRC #4967 (That ONE Team)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 2,071
Astronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud ofAstronouth7303 has much to be proud of
Re: What Features Should the Default Code REALLY include?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverStar
(Wow! This thread has divulged off-topic... Anyway...)

The question is go with a new repository or build on the old one (http://nrg.chaosnet.org/repository/)?

And, if "build on the old one" is the plan, what are the top 5 [specific] features you would like to see added?
  1. Integration into CD (Or access from). I'm thinking like a Whitepapers section in the programming forum.
  2. More nesting of categories. I know that isn't an issue (yet), but if this thing takes off...
  3. Whitepaper doc to go with code.
  4. Multiple file grouping (.h and .c together, for example)
  5. Improved interface (I'm too used to CD!)