Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cory
They may have worked fine for you, but they really aren't built for this application. They're built for material handling, in factories, etc. We often put tons of torque through them, and much more wear than they will ever see in a factory.
I know for a fact that teams like 226 and 61 have torn multiple treads in half until they got some super reinforced version of the belts for like $300 if my memory serves me correctly.
I have heard from multiple teams that they have had to replace their treads at least every competition, especially last year with the cheese grater ramp, which adds up to a lot of money.
Personally, I think the decision to use tracks or not comes down to money, more than anything else.
|
I agree whole heartly in what your saying. One of the biggest things with tracks is that you need to make sure that you have attiquit(spl?) belts. I think the belts we used this year would have probably shredded last year. You have gotta match the right belt to the application. I know I've seen alot of teams use too thin of a belt (specifically brecoflex but im sure there are others) and watched it tear in half. Obviously it wasnt strong enough for the job. We used a 75mm belt. Thats a fairly wide belt that your less likely to tear. There is always the possiblity of tearing. Thats a part of the cost benefit relationship.
SO to my point i agree with you cory.
-Pat