|
Re: Observation about Selecting Alliances
We figured out early on that our best alliance would be with a hanger. We could control the mobile goal, cap both goals, and sometimes hang (didn't always have time). We needed teams who could consistantly hang, and who agreed with us as far as strategy (robots who compliment each other well are worthless if your alliance can't agree on strategy). At Buckeye, we were the first pick by first seed (340) and then picked another great hanget (1126). Since we not only had great robots, but also a great strategy, we plowed through eliminations 6-0. So, it's not only important to have a partner that compliments your robot, but also an alliance you trust. If you end up with a partner who won't strategise with you or follow your strategy, you almost might as well be playing by yourself.
So, ranking really has nothing to do with it. Heck, there could've been a team with no robot that seeded by luck alone, while a great bot could've lost every match. It's about going with a robot that compliments yours, and a team you trust.
__________________
2005 - H.O.T.'s best year ever!
GLR Champions (thanks 66 and 68)
-Delphi Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award
Buckeye Champions (thanks 279 and 274)
West Michigan Regional Chairman's Award
Newton Division Champion (thanks 330 and 503)
Championship Winner (thanks 330 and 503)
Championship Chairman's Award Winner
The only team to win the Chairman's Award and the Championship, not to mention in the same year. (please correct me if I'm wrong)
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are solely those of the poster and do not reflect the opinions of team 67, FIRST, or any affiliate or subsidiary of the two.
|