View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-06-2004, 18:53
jpsaul7usa's Avatar
jpsaul7usa jpsaul7usa is offline
Reslife/FIRST/Disneyland Junkie
None #1212 (The Holy Hamsters)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Flagstaff / Mesa, AZ
Posts: 135
jpsaul7usa is just really nicejpsaul7usa is just really nicejpsaul7usa is just really nicejpsaul7usa is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to jpsaul7usa
Post Re: Team Forum recap?

My Arizona Regional notes:
  • stored energy rules need clarifying
  • most people liked larger number of tasks this year, they gave any team a chance to be competitive in every match
  • people want more complimentary strategies
  • people want more matches at competitions
  • people like win/loss system more than previous years'
  • some peeps thought autonomous should aid the robot throughout the match (no pure auto mode)
  • some peeps thought the auto should be its own game (keep it as is)
  • people agreed that the time should be shortened as most teams are done in 5-10 seconds
  • robots should have the option to send an 'i'm done signal' when they finish auto, and when all 4 robots are finished auto discontinues
  • missing or bad sensors were a pain
  • new technology (ir sensors, beacons) should be delivered early so teams can learn them
  • people thought pnuematics improved greatly this year
  • field was good except side walls interefered with some autos, FIRST keeps changing height year-to-year
  • final blueprints need to be final blueprints
  • perhaps teams could opt out for certain parts if they don't need them to save FIRST money
  • some people want middle-speed motors
  • some people want to be able to use industry equivalent motors
  • everyone hates the drill motor transmissions
  • people want more contacts
  • people want more sortability using the q&a
  • suggestion that each team have a student contact (to relay info to students that is regarding things like mentor award nominations)
  • people want more detailed criteria re: judging awards
  • people want past examples of how teams won (to get an idea of what to do or how to be different)
  • people want more business oriented awards to get business schools involved
  • people had lots of questions about judging logistics
  • people want inspectors with better bedside manner, more objective
  • people want more pr for events, more spectators
  • people want more consistent refereeing
  • people want to make sure teams know how to get clarification of penalties after a match
  • people want workshops on new technology well before the build season
  • people want more varied workshops

Note: I say 'people', 'peeps', and 'some people' interchangeably. They can mean almost everyone to about one or two. I like team forums.
__________________
Boeing has its Phantom Works; Lockheed Martin has its Skunk Works; 1212 has our Lucky-if-it Works.
My Website; Team 1212; DOX; NAU(Tinsley Hall Resident Assistant, Golden Key Webmaster; SAACS; NRHH)
2003 AZ Regional 5th Seed Quarter-Finalist (Rookie Year- Thanks 57 and 624!!!)
2004 AZ Regional Leadership in Control Award, AZ Regional Champion (Woohoo! Thanks 330 and 585!!!), Newton 23rd Seed
2005 AZ Regional Delphi Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award, AZ Regional Finalist (Thanks 991 and 987!!!)

The Holy Hamster Motto: It's only temporary... unless it works.
Reply With Quote