[Madison]

It looks like they've imitated the style of Michael Moore's films without any of the relevance or humor that make them interesting and entertaining.

Also, Michael Moore questions and challenges America. The title of the film is little else but invective, lacking in professionalism, subtlety or propriety.

I find that Moore's films are, at times, a bit transparent in their architecture and that he draws sweeping conclusions from too little evidence -- however, I also imagined that it was implicitly understood that those films represent only one side of a story. I resent that others would insult my intelligence and try to shame me by suggesting that I am, in any way, party to someone who "hates America."

Why not just get it over with and label him a terrorist? That must be the title of the sequel.