Thread: Meshing Gears
View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-06-2004, 14:59
Chris Hibner's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Chris Hibner Chris Hibner is offline
Eschewing Obfuscation Since 1990
AKA: Lars Kamen's Roadie
FRC #0051 (Wings of Fire)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,488
Chris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Meshing Gears

Quote:
Originally Posted by team222badbrad
I dont know much about meshing gears together while in motion. I can tell you how our 2004 transmission works though. Instead of meshing them while in motion we kept 3 different ratios constantly meshed and shifted between gears internally.

Here is my whitepaper:

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/pa...er&paperid=335
That is a really cool transmission. I see a potential issue with effeciency, so I would like to ask how well it worked in practice. Here is what I see:

1) The output gears appear to need to slide along the faces of the each other. Were the gears spaced such that they don't rub on each other, or did you just grease them to reduce the friction?

2) The non-engaged gears must rotate freely about the output shaft. Did the non-engaged ball bearings sufficiently reduce the friction between the gears and the shaft?

Just a final question: how was the overall efficiency?

I just want to say that this is really a very cool design that appears to be incredibly space efficient. Good job.
__________________
-
An ounce of perception is worth a pound of obscure.