View Single Post
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-04-2002, 17:04
rees2001 rees2001 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Rees
FRC #0340 (Greater Rochester Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 802
rees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond repute
How about:

The top 8 seeds from each regional qualify 8
+
All finalists & winners of each regional 4 (- top seeds)
+
Chairmans award winners 1
+
Higest Rookie Seed 1 (possible top 8)
+
Rookie of the year 2 (possible top 8)
x
17 regionals
=_________________________________________________ _
total 272

This is close to the number & it eliminates human error. It stink if you didn't get the #1 seed because of a scoring error by the judges. This puts a little less focus on winning & a little more on doing well. If you feel like it throw in an other award because there will be some overlap from regional to regional.
Reply With Quote