[Joe Ross]

It seems that either I don't understand the rules changes (from a month ago, or so) and how they relate to the Who Am I pictures, or that the rule isn't being enforced.

There are quite a few Who Am I pictures getting approved that, to me, do not make good Who Am I pictures. For example, there are quite a few pictures where there are multiple people pictured, and even in the description there isn't any indication of who is who. There are also a lot of pictures with only a single person where the picture is so bad, or obscured, or whatever, that you wouldn't be able to recognize the person in real life.

Some people also seem to use it as a "picture of the week" club.

Short term, I think it would good if the picture moderators were more discerning in what pictures they approved (at least for the Who Am I pictures).

Long term, I think it would be neat if the picture Moderators got to see the new picture and the current picture (IE the one it is replacing). That way, if the new picture was at least as good of quality as the current one, they could approve it, and if it isn't as good, they would be able to reject it. Quality is hard to quantify, but would take into account the age of the picture, and how clear the person is in the picture.

What do people think?