View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-09-2004, 21:59
Dekker Avesque's Avatar
Dekker Avesque Dekker Avesque is offline
Registered User
None #0173
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 6
Dekker Avesque is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Dekker Avesque Send a message via MSN to Dekker Avesque Send a message via Yahoo to Dekker Avesque
Re: Stupid question that should be easy to answer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Ross
C++ and C are quite a bit closer, but there is still a huge difference between programming a full computer, and an embedded control system.
You make it sound as if C++ is for programming on a PC and C is only for embedded control systems, when this is not the case. C and C++ were both originally for PC programming; C is merely the predecessor language to C++. C and C++ are nearly identical; C++ is C with object orientation. (C++ was originally described as "C++: Object Oriented C".)

I believe the C used in the Innovation FIRST chips that we run our robots with is a simplified version of the language, specifically suited for said chips.

Just making sure there is no confusion... C was not designed for operating robots, however a compiler was released for FIRST allows us to use the C language to operate robots.