Thread: chains
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2004, 15:32
coreyjon's Avatar
coreyjon coreyjon is offline
Flight Engineer
FRC #0250 (Team 250 Dynamos)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Upstate, Ny
Posts: 184
coreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to coreyjon
Re: chains

hmm #25 vs #35. We have used both sizes of chain. for the last two years we have used the #35, and have had no problems with it. Because teams are employing stronger multi-motor drivetrain configurations. the larger chain can take bigger shock loads, and not even break a sweat. the smaller lighter chain works, but with the #35 there is no question of it breaking. We tried the #35 composite chain, and it was expensive, and weak, we broke it in ten seconds. I think that with the stronger gear boxes, you should beef up the entire drive train. the #35 chain works well, and offers a sense of security that atleast you know the chain won't be failing you. I had a much nicer post typed out, but I timed out, and I just dont ave the long drawen out - more technical explenation.
__________________
"Jack of all trades, master of none, though offtimes better than master of one".