View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-10-2004, 17:29
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,112
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is a shifting transmission really necessary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ivey
...Being on Team 384 for 4 years, and now I'm a mentor, and from the great mentors I learned from, the more simplifed your robot, the more robust you can create it. I'm not saying it's not nice to have a shifting transmission, it is, but i don't think it's truly necessary for a competative robot.
mark
Robustness is good, but a competitive robot must also be capable. A consistenly winning robot must be more capable than its opponents.

A shifting transmission is only one way to make a capable drive system. It happens to be a popular one, and with the proliferation of good shifting designs (and now commercially available ones), it's a relatively easy one to use.