View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-11-2004, 14:34
jimfortytwo jimfortytwo is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim Paulos
#0418 (Purple Haze)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: austin
Posts: 65
jimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nicejimfortytwo is just really nice
Send a message via ICQ to jimfortytwo Send a message via AIM to jimfortytwo Send a message via Yahoo to jimfortytwo
Re: CIM speed in reverse?

Here are my teams experimentaly determined numbers for RPM.

http://chiefdelphi.com/forums/showpo...0&postcount=13

It sounds as though we did basically the same thing you are doing last year, and it worked wonderfully for us. I don't think its possible that your issue is being caused be the CIM motor differences themselves. More likely are uneven chain tensions, bent axles, or a too-tight center distance on one gear set. Before you put the motors in, did one side turn more easily than the other? Is one side now noticably more difficult to backdrive by hand than the other side, when the system is not even turned on? (if you didn't remove the internal pins in the drills, maybe don't try that)

I can say that, as a driver, adding the CIM motors to the drill motors made a huge improvement to both the pushing power and manuverability of our six wheel drive robot. I am a big fan of quad motors drives because they are within the reach of almost any team and are still competetive with more complicated shifting drive trains. I would not give up on this experiment, especially given than its the off season.