This is due to the fact that with the current system, the "overall" rankings are actually stored as a ranking for the championship, rather than using a separate table for overall rankings, as the use of the season rankings are to place your team in the elimination tournament at the championship. If I was to create a separate overall ranking, which I will do if there is a desire from a large portion of the OCCRA community, I would adjust the rankings so all teams would be assumed to have the same number of matches(10). This is what we have done in the past for teams who were not able to attend three regional qualifiers, but did take part in the championship.
NS
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dstiebel
Why have the championship competition rankings replaced the overall season rankings on the occra.chiefdelphi.com website? I think there should be two rankings: one for the overall compilation of all the matches throughout the whole season, and one for the final standings of the championship tournament. I don't mean to be selfish/arrogant but I think it's a little ridiculous that the number-one-seeded team does not appear anywhere in the so-called Overall Rankings just because we could not participate in the championship competition.  |