View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-12-2004, 18:48
Travis Covington's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Travis Covington Travis Covington is offline
Engineering Mentor
FRC #0254
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 574
Travis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Travis Covington
Re: Looking for 1/2" id flanged bearing .25" thick or less (with flange)

I am no engineer either. But I can try to explain, at least how I understand it as a mechanical engineering student, the need for roller bearings.

Ignore the comment about eccentricity and frictional losses as that was not the primary reasoning behind roller bearings.

I will start by telling you the solution we came up with last year was not nearly as elegant as I had hoped it would be. More recently the gears have started to wobble on the shafts (ever so slightly). Obviously, that is not good for wear on the gear teeth nor is it good for frictional resistance. The reasoning behind roller bearings vs. bronze bearings is that there is a very small overall width. If it were to be two bearings, with a shaft running in between them at a distance of an inch or two, I would agree that bronze bearings probably would work well enough for our purposes. But in this application (a technokat style shifting tranny) the 3/8" gear face is the total width that the bearing is supporting. The actual gear itself has to be kept perpendicular to the shaft (that is moving at a different rate than the gear) solely through the presence of a single bearing. So, in this particular case the roller bearing is better suited as it does not rely on the materials frictional coefficient or lubrication to run true and smooth. The roller bearing has tighter tolerances and is more likely to keep the gear perpendicular to the shaft with a lesser amount of contacting shaft area. A gearbox that is 3-4" wide with a shaft in the middle can easily use bronze bushings on the 2 side plates because the combination of the two bearings, at a distance of 3-4" easily keeps the shaft perpendicular to the side plates and gears. This case is quite a bit different.

I hope I made sense of this, but you can get a better idea if you download Andy Baker's whitepaper on team 45's 2003 2-speed shift on the fly transmission.

I know alot of other people have worked with similar things and maybe one of them can comment a little more on the reasoning behind this particular example.
__________________
-Travis Covington

2008-2017 - Engineering Mentor of Team 254
2001-2008 - Engineering Mentor of Team 968
1998-2001 - Mechanical Director/Driver/Member of Team 115

Last edited by Travis Covington : 12-12-2004 at 18:58.