View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-12-2004, 14:43
Greg McCoy's Avatar
Greg McCoy Greg McCoy is offline
boiler up!
FRC #3940 (CyberTooth)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 484
Greg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McCoy has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Greg McCoy
Re: FCC to Allow Wireless Access on Planes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Baker
Can people even get a wireless signal while cruising at 20-30,000 ft?

I really don't think so. Heck, I have trouble getting a signal in some spots along my 12-minute commute from home to work.

Andy B.
I think when you're using a radio on an airplane at 20,000 feet it's similar to having a 20,000-foot tall antenna tower, so you could probably get a decent signal. Cell phone signals (900 MHz - 1.9 GHz) tend to like line-of-sight, so aside from the metal tube you're flying in that's pretty much what you would have. For example, from my house I can hear airplanes talking to Chicago Air Traffic Control but I can't hear Chicago talking to them.

Though I'm a ham, I'm not really an antenna guru...hopefully somebody who operates "aeronautical mobile" knows more about it

EDIT: I'm guessing they don't want people using cell phones on airliners yet because they would have really strong signals and possibly confuse the towers on the ground. Wireless network (802.11) is much lower signal, so the clients would probably only connect to the plane. The plane itself would then use a different method to get it's Internet access. Just on educated guess...

Last edited by Greg McCoy : 15-12-2004 at 14:46.
Reply With Quote