View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-01-2005, 16:26
Jizvonius's Avatar
Jizvonius Jizvonius is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jevawn Roberts
FRC #1002 (CircuitRunners)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 46
Jizvonius is just really niceJizvonius is just really niceJizvonius is just really niceJizvonius is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Jizvonius
Re: Optical Mouse Navigation

If you guys don’t mind a little mechanical system involved in your navigation, you can control the surface quality that your optical system sees and the distance to that surface.

The system requires an interface between the carpet and your optical sensors. Say, a ball with a textured surface (ball size and material must take into account carpet properties). The sensors and ball are a fixed distance from each other by attaching the sensors to the ball cradle. Now to minimize slippage on the ground, have the entire apparatus slide up and down on a track with downward force provided by a constant tension spring.

This isn’t a completely thought through design yet, and yes, it is just a higher resolution encoder. But it is free spinning (deals with pushing and drive train slippage), much higher resolution, and with a little math you may be able to calculate yaw (depending on the placement of the ball and sensors).

It seems that we will either have to deal with mechanical or optical slop either way, so instead of having your sensors losing focus, you can just have the minimized slippage of a free spinning ball (and yell at your mechanical team if it’s not working). Anyway let me know what you guys think.