View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-01-2005, 18:18
Steve W Steve W is offline
Grow Up? Why?
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,523
Steve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Assuming a 3 vs 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swampdude
Can you imagine the poor announcer on a 3vs3 all on the same field going head to head? He'd be worn out by lunch the first day (What do you think Steve W?). I can more easily see 2 fields running simultaneously. This would be much easier to basically look at the progress of each field and highlight the more functional teams at work. I dunno, but yes this 3 team alliance needs to squeeze every drop out of their picks.
I'll put my Beatty hat on for a 3v3.

My throat hurts already. It's tough enough with 4 teams. I do believe that there will be 6 teams. I do not believe that there will be 2 fields. From what I have heard about the 1x1x1 games and how teams picked on other teams I don't foresee 2x2x2. FIRST has been focusing on team work and having 3 alliances does not seem to go along with that ideal.

PLEASE make sure your robot names and numbers can easily be seen. It would make my job so much easier.
__________________
We do not stop playing because we grow old;
we grow old because we stop playing.
Reply With Quote