Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike Rush
Why 3 vs 3? What about 2 vs 2 vs 2? This would be reminiscient of Ladder Logic but with the team format.
|
2v2v2 allows for the same "ganging up" that occured when it was 1v1v1. Two alliances teaming up to take out the third is lame, imho. I, personally, much prefer the Alliance A vs. Alliance B at a time format.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cory
As I think Bill Gold pointed out in another thread, it would take relatively little work on FIRST's part to keep the same rectangular field, but extend the player stations to make the field wider.
|
Thanks for reading my posts, Cory
I was thinking "oh well, wouldn't be the first time no one read my post..." just before I came across your response in this thread.