View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2005, 09:35
George1902's Avatar
George1902 George1902 is offline
It's a SPAM thing...
AKA: George1083; George180
FRC #0180 (SPAM)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 785
George1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge1902 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: So how would you fix this year's game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonymousMan
Hopefully, the best changes will be picked up by Dean Kamen & co, and will be added in future updates.
First, let me make it clear that I love this game. However, in an effort to make lemonade out of this thread, I'll post an idea on how to improve the game.

I would change first sentence of the third paragraph of 8.3.3 to:
Quote:
All three teams on the winning alliance will recieve a number of Ranking Points equal to the unpenalized Match Score of the losing alliance. All three teams on the losing alliance will receive a number of Ranking Points equal to their Match Score. In the case of a tie, each team will receive a number of Ranking Points equal to the opposing alliance's unpenalized Match Score.
In short, I don't like that the winning alliance, like last year, is penalized for the losing alliance's rule violations. This change would correct that, I think.
__________________
George

"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.