View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2005, 14:28
Rickertsen2 Rickertsen2 is offline
Umm Errr...
None #1139 (Chamblee Gear Grinders)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,421
Rickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Rickertsen2 Send a message via Yahoo to Rickertsen2
Re: victor brake/coast setting

Quote:
Originally Posted by sciguy125
Well, my goal was to use a relay or something so that it can be controlled in software. Useing a servo to actuate a switch doesn't seem very efficient - or fast - to me.
We have done this with an array of relays for the last two years and had no problems with inspection. I havn't read the rules carefully enough to see if it is legal this year though.


------------------- Edit --------------------------
It Looks to me like Rule R51 prohibits this sort of thing. There may be a loophole however. I believe that all the jumper does is pull a pin either high or low. there is no rule that i can see that prevents you from directly connecting this pin to a digital output. I wouldn't consider this a "custom circuit". This may be a loophole but i feel it does not go against the spirit of any rules. You are not providing a PWM outpur, not directly controlling movement and not posing a safety rist. BTW I believe the signal pin is the middle one.
__________________
1139 Alumni

Last edited by Rickertsen2 : 09-01-2005 at 14:42.