Thread: magnets?
View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2005, 01:45
David Brinza's Avatar
David Brinza David Brinza is offline
Lead Mentor, Lead Robot Inspector
FRC #0980 (ThunderBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 1,378
David Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Brinza has a reputation beyond repute
Re: magnets?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo M
That problem probably doesn't crop up with INTERPLANETARY shipments, does it?
You'd be surprised at how much grief magnets can cause on spacecraft.

For some scientific spacecraft, you have to use twisted pair wires, non-magnetic fasteners (titanium screws) and non-magnetic connectors (no steel allowed) in the flight hardware. Before any equipment is mounted on the spacecraft, it is "scanned" for magnetic fields. If the field exceeds 10 nanoTesla at 1 meter measurement distance, it does not pass the magnetic "cleanliness" spec - sometimes that's a BIG problem. (BTW, the Earth's magnetic field at the surface is about 0.5 Gauss or 50,000 nanoTesla).

Curiously, the Huygen's probe didn't quite meet the magnetic cleanliness spec for Cassini (but it was close). When the probe separated from Cassini on Christmas Day, the science magnetometers (magnetic field detectors) on Cassini measured the residual field from the probe. The MAG investigators were able to confirm the proper spin and separation rate for the probe.

See the story at:

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Cassini-...0HQ3K3E_0.html
__________________
"There's never enough time to do it right, but always time to do it over."
2003 AZ: Semifinals, Motorola Quality; SoCal: Q-finals, Xerox Creativity; IRI: Q-finals
2004 AZ: Semifinals, GM Industrial Design; SoCal: Winners, Leadership in Controls; Championship: Galileo #2 seed, Q-finals; IRI: Champions
2005 AZ: #1 Seed, Xerox Creativity; SoCal: Finalist, RadioShack Controls; SVR: Winners, Delphi "Driving Tomorrow's Technologies"; Championship: Archimedes Semifinals; IRI: Finalist
2007 LA: Finalist; San Diego: Q-finals; CalGames: Finalist || 2008 San Diego: Q-finals; LA: Winners; CalGames: Finalist || 2009 LA: Semifinals; Las Vegas: Q-finals; IRI: #1 Seed, Finalist
2010 AZ: Motorola Quality; LA: Finalist || 2011 SD: Q-finals; LA: Q-finals || 2013 LA: Xerox Creativity, WFFA, Dean's List Finalist || 2014 IE: Q-finals, LA: Finalist, Dean's List Finalist
2016 Ventura: Q-finals, WFFA, Engineering Inspiration