|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr. A
It seems to me that in order for team coaches to communicate with their drivers, and their two alliance coaches, there should be a consistant terminology for identifying goal positions. We discussed it and would suggest the following:
Left 3 . . . . . Center 3 . . . . . Right 3
Left 2 . . . . . Center 2 . . . . . Right 2
Left 1 . . . . . Center 1 . . . . . Right 1
Where one is the closest to the driver, and three is the farthest.
As long as people know their right from their left (with which I'll admit I still have some difficulty) this would make it easy to instruct a driver or suggest to an alliance member to go after a specific goal.
Whatever the terminology is it should be agreed on between teams prior to a match, but I think it would really make it easy if we have something universal that all teams already know.
What do you think out there, and how do we spread the word? 
|
Our team wanted to standardize on the number pad format, but after seeing this thread, I think the above format is better in a pressure situation (which I don't think will be unusual in this year's game).
I would like to suggest a slight change to the above, namely saying the row before the column. That seems a little easier for me to spit out for some reason. So it would be "Row 1 left" and which would be abbreviated as follows:
3 left . . . . . 3 center . . . . . 3 right
2 left . . . . . 2 center . . . . . 2 right
1 left . . . . . 1 center . . . . . 1 right
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)
|